I would like to buy a telescope for viewing the moon and planets, what's best? reflector or refractor? - view from refractor telescope
I do not know the difference between the two, although I, the two species, which is best for me and also want the look more for the best value, so that the electricity used to look? Any help is appreciated
Friday, February 5, 2010
View From Refractor Telescope I Would Like To Buy A Telescope For Viewing The Moon And Planets, What's Best? Reflector Or Refractor?
2 comments:
Refractor.
Each telescope has its own merits, for example, is the telescope), the best on the planet, the moon and the reflector for deep sky objects to observe (eg, galaxies.
However, the telescope suffers from the so-called chromatic aberration. Then the different wavelengths of light will be placed at various points by the refraction of the glass front lens focus (bending) the different wavelengths at different intensities. This is only seen in a telescope with an aperture (diameter of the lens) of 10 cm (4 inches) or more. It can be corrected modified achromatic and apochromatic () lenses.
If you do not want to spend a huge sum of money, you should consider mounting a Dobsonian telescope. They are very easy to configure and use smaller sizes (6 to 8 cm in diameter) to see.
There are nice small astronomical telescopes, too.
What do you reach in view of the enlargement for a better observation of something like Jupiter is probably 50 per inch diameter increased by 6.8 inch reflector would also with a capacity from 300 to 400 but I do not think that rises from 150 to 200 works very well for me.
My own telescopes include a 10 "Dobsonian reflector and refractor 80 mm. The bezel is easily 100x magnification of the moon, sun and birds in and out of our house for birds, while the bezel is much the largest nebulae and galaxies carefully. I built the Dobson and spent several hundred dollars in it. expanses similar businesses can $ 500 or less. The bezel is about $ 250 or less.
Post a Comment